Once attracted radicals. How many former violent radicals became nonviolent in the 70s! From a certain point in time, however, many former radicals went elsewhere. Because first attracted radicals and now reject? Certainly something has changed. Pannella, I love, closed the Radical Party and had it not been for the assembly of a thousand friends we would still cloak and the Movement Pannella Club, which was not bad, but it certainly was something different than what was before and from what we have now. Break up always all part of the biodegradability of some radical that is environmentally friendly, but it is also a symptom of self-destruction and the other parties of all this end up being afraid. See also the case with Rose in the Fist. I do not think at all that all responsibilities of the non-operation agreement with the Socialists are to be attributed to the radicals, but they certainly need to refound the Italian Radical Party (possibly along with the radicals outside the Italian Radicals like me) and make it into the PD. My proposal is to open circles PD that are explicitly and methodologically radical, socialist, liberal, secular, liberal, Republican, Liberal, European federalists, nonviolent, neoazionisti, geolibertari. This is great news and I think that would repellent rather than attractive force. Fellow Italian Radicals, what do you think?
0 comments:
Post a Comment