Marchionne seems to me that what is proposed, although it is questionable as I have and the reflection, the effect on anti-management-FIAT, is in no way comparable to the working conditions in China. There is also to say that the working conditions of workers in China, as well as India (which are two completely different worlds together), they go to improve, while those of Italian workers in general are getting worse! It seems, frankly, that is the case of Fiat, though, because still the Fiat workers are privileged and protected by ipersindacalizzati all the protection of the world, and all made with employment contracts of indefinite duration and, when the company's problems are laid off. As has always been protected by the State throughout the Fiat, but now it seems that you are turning the page on everything, whether it will continue to keep the factories in Turin and close them! As Italian citizens we must ask whether it is appropriate to shift the focus the real precarious rather than those that have never been and perhaps it will in a few months, in case (remote, knowing Italy) that will close the plants.
In Italy no one invests in young people entering the working world ... But this is understandable because those who invest will be excluded, and for decades, from any decision-making? Unfortunately, the Italian company is a cast and no young person can succeed in almost any sector, if not lick someone's ass for decades! There are areas, however, where it is not so and where meritocracy is the host and young people can also quickly get to the key roles. That's the point, according to me: rather than cry on them trying to roll up our sleeves and really work hard to achieve their goals, trying to leave the world around him a bit 'better than we received from those who came before us. In a merit-based system such as that of which I speak, however, the "fixed income" has no role, because meritocracy, just means that if you earn more than good, if you are less gains less! Most of those who make plans "medium to long term" in the world have no fixed income and certainly not living hand to mouth. Of course there are large areas where it is desirable that the individual has his regular fixed salary, but those workers who would like to participate also more concerned about the fate of their company, for example through a mechanism that makes that a portion of the salary comes directly from the profits of the company, since the emancipation of the working classes also passes through the overcoming of the simple fixed income, but not, of course , ever downward! Regarding safeguards, then, are rights only if they are universal, meaning if they relate to all workers in all fields, otherwise called privileges.
