Easy Way To Find Shiny Pokemon Platinum

cutting spending! The politics of illusion

The program of the People of Liberty was the abolition of the provinces in these terms:
"So do not add the tax burden.
Rather, we try to reduce it.
Without the goal of law enforcement and recovery of
'tax evasion.
Our commitment will be on the opposite side of public spending,
that will reduce its part too, does not guarantee
social, and therefore compressible.
Since the cost of politics and bureaucracy
(eg Provinces useless). "There are provinces
useful and what and why? About the electoral program of the PDL also recommend the following interesting web page that states that the PDL, after the elections rigged its program!
http://masaghepensu.splinder.com/post/22134267/sorpresa-il-pdl-trucca-i-vecchi-programmi-elettorali-online--ma-non-troppa
The election program of the Democratic Party in parliamentary elections 2008 is this one:
http://www.partitodemocratico.it/gw/producer/dettaglio.aspx?id_doc=45315
The only abolition of the provinces of which we speak is the "Elimination of the provinces where they are metropolitan cities. " Well, honestly I think little stuff!
A vote should be fewer and fewer people. Those who abstained are a mass electoral potential that sooner or later someone will notice and use. As will be used at the present time nobody knows. It will be a dictator? It will be a democratic party (of course I am not referring here to the PD)? Who knows? Certainly we can say that our democratic system is not beyond the assessment of the goodness or otherwise of democracy. In a system in which the owner of the means of mass communication is the head of the government, has major interests in construction, publishing, film, finance, football and who knows how many and which other areas, that democracy c ' is it? In an electoral system which decides who comes in parliament are few people with blocked lists (in the absence of preferences) is that democracy? About
structural economic reforms that I think the state should give only the social pension, old age and disability. Leaving the rest to the free (so no more compulsory) private pensions and introducing series and universal social protection measures for those who really can not find means of survival. Should be also made cuts to health care, along with a major rationalization of the sector. Our health is not much more expensive than other countries, but wasted too many and often scandalous. Public spending should be overall size and content. Many civil servants should simply be fired! Regarding the cost of the policy makes them almost zero! We cut the money to the politicians and give them reimbursement for their expenses documented, with the obligation to make public (on web) their accounts. The waste would still be there, but certainly there would be even greater democratic control.

The Aud Seating Chart

In a civilized country as a state broadcaster RAI (which receives public money) does not make silly programs such as the Isle of the famous and does not compete with other television networks by collecting revenues from advertising. In Italy, neither the left nor the right intend to change that bleak. Broadcasters Public and private national television channels are under the control of the system, but the scheme is not only Berlusconi.
like Berlusconi because it believed that "eat and is eating", but its policy is only his interests, stripping Italy of honest people who work and have its privileges. Politicians are all the same, but the politicians are not all politicians! Berlusconi does not like to two-thirds of Italians, but that does not mean anything. He makes his money and politics with the creation of illusions. The Northern League is a different thing, much more dangerous. Mr Berlusconi will be no more, the Northern League will, unfortunately.